Search Site
Menu

Implications of a settlement with one of two (or more) defendants.

In the chess match that can take place in the course of litigating personal injury cases, one topic has especially fascinated me. It involves the situation where you sue two defendants but settle prior to the trial with one of them. The Supreme Judicial Court has clarified an ambiguity which carried into the 1990s. That clarification, in the case of Morea v. Cosco, Inc., 422 Mass. 601 (1996), prohibits the fact of a settlement to come into evidence in a trial against the remaining defendant. To be sure, there are exceptions where this exclusion will not apply. For the most part, however, the rule establishes that the settlement is not admissible. The Supreme Judicial Court made this decision so that settlements can be encouraged with one party. Also, the adjustment for the settlement will be done by the judge as there has to be an offset for the amount that was paid to the plaintiff by the settling tortfeasor. The Massachusetts’s Guide to Evidence, Rule 408, codifies the rule of Morea v. Cosco.

All of this is heartwarming news to plaintiffs. It affords flexibility for there may be times when a resolution against one defendant is preferred. In other circumstances, it may be that the injured party may prefer to have both defendants in the trial of the personal injury action. However, it is always nice to have the choice and your lawyer can advise you, the injured party, which is the preferred strategy. Happily, if it turns out that the better approach is to settle against Defendant 1 while leaving the case open against Defendant 2 – probably the more common approach – the evidentiary implications are known in advance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feinberg & Alban, P.C. fervently protects your rights
  • The Boston firm of Feinberg & Alban, P.C. specializes its practice in the area of personal injury.

    The attorneys serve the entire state of Massachusetts in addition to affiliating with lawyers in other states to handle cases outside of Massachusetts.

  • $7.7 Million Award for Feinberg & Alban Client in Personal Injury Trial

    Boston Attorneys Win Highest Injury Verdict in Massachusetts in 2011 & 2012.

Client Reviews
  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I just wanted to drop a quick note to say thank you to Santora Colleen for securing such a great outcome on my wife case. We really appreciate all your hard work, the way you handled the negotiations, and how you kept us informed every step of the wa...

    Read more

    Alexander Foygelman

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Colleen has been incredibly thoughtful, supportive, and professional throughout every step of our case. She guided us carefully through the process, always taking the time to answer our questions and ensure we understood our options. She consistently...

    Read more

    M Gao

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I had the pleasure of working with Attorney Colleen Santora after I was involved in a car accident. She was very attentive, professional, and courteous throughout our entire case involvement. I appreciate everything she did to help me. She is wonderf...

    Read more

    Tracey Martin

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    I was in a terrible car accident. I was referred to Colleen by a friend. She is amazing! Answered my every call, text and fought for me. Being a hairdresser for 40yrs it was horrible trying to cut hair with a broken hand, but in the end Colleen got m...

    Read more

    Donna Russo

  • google
    5.0/5.0

    Colleen Santora is an outstanding attorney. I reached out to her after I was hit by a car as a pedestrian and she walked me through every step of the process with clarity and patience. She’s a fantastic communicator, extremely responsive and alway...

    Read more

    Cynthia Garabedian

See all reviews
Awards & Affiliations
Contact us

Quick Contact Form

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.